Multi-tenant, AWS-hosted, pre-validated cloud eQMS built on the M-Files document-management platform that centralises document control, training, CAPA, deviation, change, audit, complaint, supplier, equipment, and design-control processes for life-sciences SMBs and lower-mid-caps — with an all-inclusive annual subscription bundling implementation, system validation, unlimited training, hosting, and 24/7 support.
SimplerQMS A/S (HQ: Copenhagen, Denmark; founded 2017 by Allan Murphy Bruun and Jacob Sjørslev Hyrdum, both formerly of Danish medical-device manufacturer Ambu) is a single-product company offering a vertically packaged distribution of M-Files — a Finnish metadata-driven document-management platform — extended with life-sciences-specific workflows, templates, modules, and validation artefacts. The vendor states explicitly: "SimplerQMS has utilized M-Files as the foundational platform, configuring and building upon it to create a quality management system software tailored for the Life Sciences industry." M-Files supplies the underlying repository, metadata model, workflow engine, Microsoft Office integration, audit trail, and electronic-signature primitives. SimplerQMS supplies the life-sciences QMS data model, pre-built templates, GAMP 5 validation evidence, ISO 13485 vendor certification, implementation services, and ongoing regulatory surveillance.
Desktop-client instability and the absence of a non-Windows desktop client are recurring themes in user reviews, tied to the underlying M-Files dependency. Target customer is the SMB to lower-mid-cap life-sciences organisation (typically 10–500 employees) that wants out-of-the-box ISO 13485 / 21 CFR Part 11 / GAMP 5 compliance without standing up its own validation engineering function.
SimplerQMS is fully validated according to ISPE GAMP 5 (Category 4) and is re-validated upon new versions or standard updates. The organisation is ISO 13485:2016 certified by Bureau Veritas (certificate DK018641) since 2018, and ISO 27001:2022 certified at both the vendor and AWS hosting layer. SOC 2 Type II is not separately attested. Vendor scale (third-party signals): ~34 employees and ~$3.7M annual revenue (Latka, September 2025), with tripling-of-headcount trajectory across 2024–2025.
The product is a single, general life-sciences edition with vertical-specific landing pages and templates (Pharma & Biotech, Medical Devices, CRO/CDMO, Clinical Labs) rather than separate SKUs per vertical. Pharma & Biotech packaging emphasises GMP-compliant documentation, batch records, training, and CAPA aligned with FDA 21 CFR Parts 210–211, ICH Q10, EU GMP, and PIC/S GMP.
Core Capabilities
FDA & GxP Compliance
International Standards
Security Certifications
Data Integrity & Validation
Multi-tenant SaaS. No on-prem, single-tenant, or hybrid option publicly offered. Hosted on Amazon Web Services (AWS); backups every 15 minutes, data stored across multiple locations, 24/7 monitoring. AWS region selection is not enumerated on public pages — EU-region hosting is implied but not explicitly stated. Access via web browser, M-Files Windows desktop client, and iOS/Android mobile apps. No native macOS desktop client (reviewer-flagged). Direct integration with Microsoft 365 (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook) — documents are edited in place in Office applications and saved back in one click. SSO via Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) and Google Workspace via SAML/OIDC; MFA supported; Okta not explicitly named.
API: M-Files REST API exposed through SimplerQMS configuration ("access SimplerQMS from within scripting environments"). Webhook support, GraphQL, OData, and named pre-built connectors (Salesforce, NetSuite, SAP, Jira, Azure DevOps) are not documented at depth on public pages. Cloud storage: 150,000 documents and 200 GB included; additional capacity per Standard/Full license. No published concurrent-user benchmarks, throughput numbers, or uptime SLA percentages.
$17,500/year is the vendor's published minimum subscription price, covering up to 15 users. Per-license rates above that floor are not posted; quotes require sales contact. SourceForge separately lists a $13,750/year starting price, an older and lower figure than the vendor's current published minimum. Four license tiers exist (Viewer free; Light; Standard; Full), billed as a per-user annual subscription with an all-inclusive services bundle. The Viewer license is free and unlimited for invited auditors, inspectors, consultants, and external collaborators.
The vendor's pricing page advertises no self-serve trial, only "Book a Demo." A free trial is listed on GetApp and SourceForge but brokered through sales. No separate setup fees, validation fees, training fees, or implementation fees apply. The annual subscription is the sole recurring line item. Additional licenses added mid-term are pro-rated. License quantities can be reduced only at renewal. Contract length is not published — third-party commentary cites 1–3 year terms as typical. Customers receive free data export on cancellation.
Vendor markets 5–6 weeks for the first implementation phase, with customer testimonials reporting go-live in 6 weeks (LiNA Medical). The Basic Pharma case study describes a four-phase, multi-quarter rollout for a 200+ employee CDMO. The 5–6 week figure applies to small biotech and medical-device customers (10–50 employees, limited module scope). Mid-cap pharma deployments with multiple sites and complex SOP libraries take 3–6+ months for full-module deployment at 100+ employee organisations.
All-inclusive subscription bundle covers implementation, configuration, initial validation, data migration, unlimited live user training, cloud hosting, QMS templates (ISO 13485:2016 and 21 CFR Part 820 compliant), system updates, ongoing re-validation, and 24/7 support. No separately priced professional services appear on the published price list. Free data migration is bundled. Specific eQMS-to-eQMS migration paths (from MasterControl, Veeva, TrackWise, or Documentum) are not documented on public pages. Most case studies involve paper-to-digital or Excel-to-digital migrations. Common pitfalls: customer reports of an initial learning curve, M-Files desktop-client instability under load, brief onboarding training not covering all functionality, and the metadata-driven model requiring organisational discipline.
Anonymous feedback from pharmaceutical professionals using this solution
4.9 out of 5
Based on 14 verified reviews
What Users Like
Customer support quality draws consistent praise: "Exceptional customer service, excellent hands-on training… true partners in implementing SimplerQMS" (Sr. Director of Quality, Biotechnology, US). The all-inclusive commercial model and price-to-value ratio are cited directly: "I have used several other brand-name eQMS systems over the years and I find that SimplerQMS offers a lot of the same functionality at a more competitive price." Audit readiness is a third recurring theme: "We got compliments from auditors during audits and afterward… [auditors] witness the way SimplerQMS works and the advantages of it" (Basic Pharma).
What Users Dislike
The M-Files-derived UI draws criticism, described as "looks like Windows 95," with occasional desktop-client instability: "M-Files interface can be unstable sometimes, resulting in freezing… requiring a reboot." Electronic-signature presentation is a second friction point: "Electronic signatures are displayed very inefficiently and adds 3 pages to the end of the document. Also e-sig doesn't look as professional as DocuSign." Onboarding depth and feature discovery draw complaints: "The onboarding training is brief and doesn't cover all the functionality." Reporting depth, the metadata learning curve, and the absence of a dedicated desktop client for non-Windows users round out user-reported friction.
Help the community
Share your experience with SimplerQMS anonymously. Your insights help pharmaceutical professionals make better software decisions.
Contribute Anonymous FeedbackPublicly disclosed pharmaceutical and biotech organizations
Jump to section